Search for: "Technology Service Corporation v. Fox" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Fox Corporation has agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787.5 million (£630m) to settle a landmark defamation suit brought by the election technology company over claims repeatedly aired on Fox News suggesting its voting machines were involved in a conspiracy to rig the 2020 US presidential election. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 in favour of the broadcasters, ruling that Aereo and its cloud-based technology was too similar to a traditional cable company to say that its service did not infringe. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by tracey
Supreme Court Gale & Anor v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2011] UKSC 49 (26 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206 (27 October 2011) Hunt v Harb & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1239 (27 October 2011) Hertsmere Borough Council v Lovat [2011] EWCA Civ 1185 (27 October 2011) Maxwell, R (on the application of) v The Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2011] EWCA Civ 1236 (27 October… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Rupert Murdoch to Step Down as Chairman of Fox Corporation and Fox News Billings Gazette – David Bauder (Associated Press) | Published: 9/21/2023 Rupert Murdoch, the 92-year-old Australian media magnate whose creation of Fox News made him a force in American politics, is stepping down as leader of both Fox’s parent company and his News Corp. media holdings. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
In particular, Huang covered Australian Information Commission v Facebook Inc [2020] FCA 531, which concerned an ex parte application for service outside of the jurisdiction and an application for substituted service. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/TWGVKw39Ki -> EU privacy watchdog calls for new controls on the export of surveillance and interception technologies https://t.co/MYvUCRPXRH -> Cornwall Council wins right to terminate £160m outsourcing agreement with BT Cornwall https://t.co/k0z3GlAHZB -> Court refuses to certify class for warrantless searches Monaco v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:40 am by Glenn
Far bigger is the more fundamental question of who owns UGC in the first place, particularly where — as is the case with most social media services — downloading, embedding and re-posting of user content are technological capabilities integrated into the service. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
CBS Corporation, et al., 11-1240) until it had decided the latest round in the Fox TV case (FCC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:26 pm by Terry Hart
Case in point: one of the arguments made by the EFF in an amicus brief it filed last week in the Fox v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
 Philippa Webb, Journal of Information Law and Technology, SSRN. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:52 am by Marie Louise
(Tangible IP) Impulse Technology – New Case: Microsoft sued over Kinect and motion tracking patent: Impulse Technology Ltd. v. [read post]